Subscribe
GET INVOLVED

PICK YOUR ENTRY POINT.

Every one of these matters. Start wherever fits — and if you're ready to go further, we'd love to have you.

Check any that interest you, enter your email, and we'll follow up with next steps.

DISCUSSION PROTOCOL

BRING A PAPER INTO THE ROOM.

A facilitator's gist and five discussion questions for each of the first three tentpole papers — ready to use in a school board meeting, staff room, or community forum.

Set 1: Introduction Paper (From Compulsion to Mutual Assent)

Gist for facilitators: For about 30 years, accountability has been top-down and test-driven. The paper argues that this has hit its limits and that a better system rests on the genuine buy-in of students, families, educators, and communities.

  1. When you hear "school accountability," what comes to mind? Who is accountable to whom, in your experience?
  2. The paper says the current system has produced compliance but not widespread improvement. Does that match what you've seen in your school or your child's school? Where does it fit, and where doesn't it?
  3. The paper separates compulsion (you must) from assent (we agree, and I have a real say). Describe a time when each worked in your own life. Which lasted longer?
  4. The paper imagines accountability flowing both ways, so that states and districts answer to schools and communities as well as the reverse. What would you want your district to be accountable to you for?
  5. The trapeze analogy says people won't let go of the old bar until they're sure the new one is safe. What would you need to see or hear before you'd feel safe letting go of the current system?

Set 2: Community Trust (Elevating Trust as the First Principle)

Gist for facilitators: Trust isn't a byproduct of good test results. It's the foundation. The paper proposes that communities help define what matters, that evidence of learning be broadened, and that governance be genuinely shared.

  1. When you think about your local schools, what do you trust them to do well? Where is your trust weaker, and why?
  2. If you could add three things to how your school's success is reported, beyond reading and math scores, what would they be?
  3. In Kentucky, students in some districts present a "defense of learning" in front of educators, families, and community members. What would you gain from seeing a student explain and defend their work, compared with seeing a score report?
  4. The paper warns against "engagement theater," such as listening sessions held after decisions are made or advisory groups with no authority. Have you experienced this? What separates real engagement from the performance of it?
  5. Leaders build trust by sharing information early, admitting what isn't working, and following through. What is one concrete thing a school leader could do this year to earn more trust?

Set 3: Legal Sufficiency (Proving Inadequacy Without the Test Score Trap)

Gist for facilitators: Many school funding lawsuits have relied on test score gaps to show that a state isn't providing an adequate education. The paper argues that inputs (qualified teachers, safe buildings, curriculum, counselors, libraries) and broader outcomes (graduation, college, career, civic life) make a stronger case and lead to better remedies.

  1. Think about a school you know well. What are the basic ingredients a child needs there to have a real opportunity to learn?
  2. The paper says test score gaps are "symptoms," while underlying gaps in resources and opportunity are the cause. Does that distinction make sense given what you've seen? Why or why not?
  3. Testimony from teachers, students, and superintendents has moved courts in school funding cases. What story from your own school or community would you want a decision-maker to hear?
  4. Kentucky's Rose decision described an adequate education broadly: communication skills, civic knowledge, mental and physical wellness, and preparation for work and further learning. Which of these matter most to you? Is anything missing from your own definition?
  5. If a state were ordered to fix an inadequate system, who should help design the remedy? What would make you trust it?
HELP PITCH THE NEW TENT.
Read the Resources Join the Movement Subscribe